Thursday, July 30, 2015

"....it's still the law of the land, and I intend to obey it!" Charlie Cotchipee, "Purlie Victorious" by Ossie Davis




 

Bill Cosby, Donald Trump, lion-killing dentists, a letter from our Congressional Rep. Buddy Carter explaining why the Supreme Court has abused their power—are there enough things to be enraged about today?  I’m not sure I have the energy. 

I think it’s clear that the majority of people, at least those who still have a few functional brain cells, think those mentioned are at least not quite getting it.  To bring back a really old and horrible metaphor, the lunatics are running the asylum.  Certainly that would be the case if Trump got elected to any it political office ever.  Bill Cosby seems to be finally out of excuses and as for his wife, as we say in the South, “Bless her”!  I can’t even read about the Great White Hunter, literally makes me so ill I push it away.  No way ever to justify killing beautiful animals for no reason on earth whatsoever. 

Our elected representative to Congress is another matter.  Obviously, I did not vote for him.  While I was tickled to see Jack Kingston disappear, I’m afraid his replacement is not much of an improvement.  In his letter today he proved himself worthy of the name Republican.  In his letter I received today he actually said, and I quote “…I worry that people with the same belief as me, that marriage is between one man and one woman, will be targets for discrimination”.  He goes on to let me know that he and “129 other Bipartisan House Members” are co-sponsoring H.R. 2802, the “First Amendment Defense Act”.  This will prevent the Federal government from “discriminating against any individual or group based on their beliefs in the conventional and biblical definition of marriage”. 

Yes, you read that right.  An act to defend the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.  To refresh our collective memories, this is the First Amendment:  “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”  Pretty unambiguous to me.  I think it was, as the rest of the document, designed to be pretty broad and all-encompassing.  Sounds to me like it pretty much covers anyone believing anything at any time which I think just might include those set-upon traditionally married folks. 

I suppose I will answer my Congressman who also tells me what an honor it is to serve the First District of Georgia.  I suppose I should be glad he’s not Donald Trump.  Or Bill Cosby.  Or a lion-killing dentist.  On the other hand, he’s a member of Congress who doesn’t respect the Supreme Court of the United States of America.

No comments:

Post a Comment