Sunday, June 28, 2015

Me and the Supremes


                                                   


 I do try, when I sit down to write, to ask myself if I will say something that hasn’t been said a thousand times before either by me or someone who has said it better than me.  So let’s go with the new information transmitted by Facebook this week.

It’s been an exciting week for Facebook, with two ground-breaking decisions by the Supreme Court and the proposed removal of the Confederate flag following the horrific massacre in Charleston, SC. 

Fortunately, everyone agrees that the massacre was horrific.  Less agreement about the Confederate symbolism.  The new information on this topic is the growing belief in certain circles that the way to deal with shootings of black people by white people is to arm the black people (to keep the body count equal, I assume).

There is even less agreement with the Supreme Court decisions.  I learned nothing new about the health care decision and am just glad it is still with us.  The other historic decision, of course, is about marriage.

I am also gleeful about that decision and mostly found support from my Facebook friends who are my Facebook friends because they do understand what is right and just (I can say that, it’s my blog).  There has been a lot of Bible quoting and referencing, some more accurate than others.  I have heard that homosexuality is an abomination, it is the worst sin there is, but also that in the Old Testament it’s not that bad overall.  The Old Testament offers that the worst sin is lack of charity.  I tend to agree with that one as much as I agree with anything biblical.  I even did my own research and noted that there is a homosexual reference in Leviticus, but most of the other citing are from the New Testament. There is a lot of posting to the tune of “Love the sinner, hate the sin”.  Some postings have been very eloquent and detailed even when arriving at the same conclusion.  Also one posting from a “used to be gay” guy who found the Lord and thereby stopped sinning. 

I try to be open to new ideas, I really do.  I can’t say that I read these things without bias—but I did so without prejudice.  I can say that because my opinion is informed, both by what I have read and what I have learned from my almost 70 years of life experience. I believe my length of living gives me the right to advise, counsel, guide and teach.  It does not give me the right to moralize.

I have known more than a few gay people over the years.  I can’t say I’ve loved them all, but I have loved some and got to know them.   To me and one Episcopal Priest I knew years ago, a sin is knowingly causing harm to another (person or animal).  Therefore, the other Christian/Biblical sins, greed, adultery, lying, cheating, murder, etc. meet that qualification.  Homosexuality does not.  A homosexual can certainly be guilty of all those other sins, but not because of his sexuality.  No one has ever informed me in a logical manner how two men having sex causes harm to another human being. 

Molesting children is a sin; being gay does not make one a child molester.  Cheating on your spouse is a sin for heterosexual and homosexual individuals.  Being homosexual isn’t a sin just because you are heterosexual.  The gay people I know have known are kind, caring, funny and creative.  Not a child molester in the bunch.  Some have been guilty of adultery by living a lie in a marriage before becoming who they are.  The door is still open to someone explaining to me (NOT by quoting the Bible) how I am misguided.  I’m sure I’ve mentioned before that I am not now nor have I ever been a Christian.

I still would be interested in the story of the “used to be gay” guy and exactly how that works.  Is he automatically aroused by women now?  Does he avoid sex entirely?  Does he just close his eyes and use his imagination when he has sex with a woman?  Seriously, I would read  be rational discourse on the subject. 

In the meantime, I cannot agree to disagree or love the sinner but not the sin.  If you love someone because they are who they are then that love includes them being lesbian, bi-sexual, gay or transgendered.* 

 

*Transgender is whole ‘nother topic for a whole ‘nother day.

No comments:

Post a Comment